BREAKING: Study from 12/20 Shows COVID-19 Alters People’s DNA!

6
332

EDIT (10/27/2021): Many people have mentioned that viruses do have the ability to integrate into the genome. I appreciate the corrections; we on the more conservative side of things do not feel the same compulsion as our brethren on the Left to destroy people who correct us when we are incorrect. I’m in health policy and not virology, so these readers’ input led me to look further into “reverse transcription.” It does happen – about 10% of the human genome is from viruses – but apparently it is not a common occurrence. Thus, the term “novel” may have been used by the researchers to describe an exceptionally uncommon occurrence, whereas in public health it means “never before encountered.” Thankfully, readers’ corrections have has led us to the foundational issue: those pushing the COVID vaccines have claimed that the mRNA in the vaccines does not alter the human genome, whereas these researchers have uncovered evidence that this is perhaps yet another lie. This further leads to the threat that the COVID vaccines have the capacity to create an “endogenous retrovirus,” which is when this viral RNA that has fused to the human genome copies itself and leads to illnesses. If this is the case, this research suggests the vaccine may have the capacity to poison humans at the cellular level over the long term.

A study tucked away on PubMed from last December supports yet another “wacko conspiracy theory”: SARS-CoV-2 (a.k.a. “SARS2”), the virus that causes Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19), appears to alter the human genome.

However, first note that this study has not been peer reviewed. Peer review is the important final step in the scientific paper development process wherein other experts in the field weigh in on the accuracy of the paper’s methodology, data, and results. Once the paper passes the peer review process, it’s ready to be published.

Second, note that the study has still not been peer reviewed despite having been finalized nine months ago, which is very odd given that the peer review process normally takes four to six weeks. I’m sure that’s just an oversight.

Third, note that this apparent ability for the SARS2 virus to insert itself into humans’ DNA codes supports Dr. Leanna Wen’s statement on CNN from a month ago saying that the vaccinated have been turned into reservoirs of the SARS2 virus.

Anyway, as this study will likely be taken down, here’s how to find the paper and its abstract:

Title: SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome.
Authors: Liguo Zhang, Alexsia Richards, Andrew Khalil, Emile Wogram, Haiting Ma, Richard A Young, Rudolf Jaenisch
PubMed Reference Number (PMID): 33330870
PubMed Central Reference Number (PMCID): PMC7743078
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1101/2020.12.12.422516

Abstract: “Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding and recurrence of PCR-positive tests have been widely reported in patients after recovery, yet these patients most commonly are non-infectious. Here we investigated the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome and that transcription of the integrated sequences might account for PCR-positive tests. In support of this hypothesis, we found chimeric transcripts consisting of viral fused to cellular sequences in published data sets of SARS-CoV-2 infected cultured cells and primary cells of patients, consistent with the transcription of viral sequences integrated into the genome. To experimentally corroborate the possibility of viral retro-integration, we describe evidence that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse transcribed in human cells by reverse transcriptase (RT) from LINE-1 elements or by HIV-1 RT, and that these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed. Human endogenous LINE-1 expression was induced upon SARS-CoV-2 infection or by cytokine exposure in cultured cells, suggesting a molecular mechanism for SARS-CoV-2 retro-integration in patients. This novel feature of SARS-CoV-2 infection may explain why patients can continue to produce viral RNA after recovery and suggests a new aspect of RNA virus replication.”

Don’t feel dumb if that abstract went right over your head. You need to go line by line to “decode” these things, so let me help you. As a health policy expert, I have to do this all the time.

(1) “Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding and recurrence of PCR-positive tests have been widely reported in patients after recovery,…”

Many people are testing positive for COVID after they’ve recovered.

(2) “…yet these patients most commonly are non-infectious.”

But these people are not spreading the disease.

(3) “Here we investigated the possibility…”

We are looking into why this is occurring because this is very much out of the ordinary.

(4) “…that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse-transcribed…

We suspect that what is happening is that the COVID virus is writing itself into people’s DNA.

(5) “…and integrated into the human genome…”

We suspect that the COVID virus is altering people’s DNA.

(6) “…and that transcription of the integrated sequences…”

We suspect people’s COVID-altered DNA is actually producing the COVID virus.

(7) “…might account for PCR-positive tests.”

We suspect that people’s COVID-altered DNA is producing the COVID virus that is causing these people to test positive for COVID.

(8) “In support of this hypothesis, we found chimeric transcripts…”

We suspect this is happening because we found non-human RNA stuck into human DNA.

(9) “…consisting of viral fused to cellular sequences…”

The non-human RNA that was stuck into the human DNA was the COVID-19 virus.

(10) “…in published data sets of SARS-CoV-2 infected cultured cells…”

The healthy human cells that other scientists had infected with COVID-19 in their labs ended up with the COVID-19 RNA stuck into their human DNA.

(11) “…and primary cells of patients,…”

When other scientists tested the DNA of people who got sick with COVID-19, they also found that these people’s DNA had COVID-19 RNA stuck into them.

(12) “…consistent with the transcription of viral sequences integrated into the genome.”

Both the human cells infected in the lab and the cells of COVID patients showed that COVID RNA had altered their DNA.

(13) “To experimentally corroborate the possibility of viral retro-integration,…”

The Scientific Method requires we make a falsifiable and repeatable prediction that aligns with our guess that COVID RNA is altering human DNA.

(14) “…we describe evidence that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse transcribed in human cells by reverse transcriptase (RT) from LINE-1 elements or by HIV-1 RT, and that these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed. Human endogenous LINE-1 expression was induced upon SARS-CoV-2 infection or by cytokine exposure in cultured cells,…”

This is the technical process by which we tested our falsifiable and repeatable prediction.

(15) “…suggesting a molecular mechanism for SARS-CoV-2 retro-integration in patients.”

As required by the Scientific Method, our falsifiable and repeatable prediction provided supporting evidence we are right when we think COVID-19 RNA is altering human DNA.

(16) “This novel feature…”

This ability of viral RNA to alter human DNA has never been seen before by science.

(17) “…of SARS-CoV-2 infection…”

COVID-19 is the only virus known to science that has the ability to alter human DNA.

(18) “…may explain why patients can continue to produce viral RNA after recovery…”

The ability for COVID-19 to alter human DNA might be why these recovered patients keep testing positive for COVID.

(19) “…and suggests a new aspect of RNA virus replication.”

The ability for COVID-19 to alter human DNA is completely new in nature.

Put this all together, and this is what you get:

The COVID-19 virus has the ability to insert itself into the human genome and produce copies of itself, which is making all these people test positive. This has never been seen to occur in nature, ever.

So if the ability of a virus to fuse itself into the human genome has never been observed in nature in more than a century of viral research, then how did SARS-CoV-2 get this ability?

Perhaps it’s never been observed in nature… but maybe it’s been observed to occur in a lab?

CHECK OUT THE LATEST TROY SMITH SHOW!

SHARE AND SPREAD THE WORD, BIG TECH IS CENSORING US LIKE NEVER BEFORE!

THE TRUTH IS AT LAUNCH LIBERTY!

6 COMMENTS

        • No, Matt. My attorney and I have found at least six places where you have made libelous and defaming comments on social networks using your blatantly false statements about me. I do not work for Kew, inc….Kew, Inc. does not provide gene therapy. Kew, Inc, is NOT a pharma company. I do not have an active LinkIn account. I do not get paid by anyone.

          It would be wise for you to delete those posts from all social media…..those posts that defame me and Kew, Inc.

          Curious why you don’t appreciate the correct information on medical and research issues.

          • Barb, first, you haven’t consulted with a lawyer because no lawyer would advise that I have libeled you when (1) I have never revealed your last name; (2) you, of your own accord and without duress, have willingly entered into the public domain by making a public comment on a public website; and (3) it’s not even me replying to you. Second, you do work for KEW, because every time you comment this site pings your IP address, which revealed your town, in which there is one individual with your specific name, which allowed me to cross reference your town and name against LinkedIn, which again revealed one single individual with your town and name, who just happened to work for KEW, which is a company that (1) maps an individual’s genome to identify their genetic variants for medical treatments; (2) partners with at least two of China’s top medical schools; and (3) is supported by China’s largest diagnostic testing company; and has a CEO that (4) co-founded four biotech and pharma companies, serves as a board member on at least seven companies, holds highly coveted professorships at Harvard University, is the editor-in-chief of an academic biotech journal, was personally appointed by President Obama to a bioethics commission, and is a partner in a pharma/biotech venture capital firm. The reason you don’t have a LinkedIn account is because YOU DELETED IT AFTER I WROTE THAT ARTICLE. By the way, I also see you camping out on those webinars, too. It is beyond obvious, given the time you have spent following me around and reporting me FOR OVER A YEAR that you are being paid to discredit me. Don’t get me wrong, I’m flattered that I’m giving you and your cronies so much trouble by speaking the truth, but you ramble so much that the only thing you’re doing is giving me more credibility. No go home to your huge $760,000 house in that crappy area of the state you in. Seriously, who drops that amount of money on a McMansion in that area??

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here