Over 600 protestors were arrested in Germany after taking to the streets despite not being permitted by their government.
Although the German government had allowed over 80,000 people to march in a ‘gay pride’ parade just a week ago, German authorities denied the permit to the anti-lockdown group for the August 2nd protest.
A German Judge even moved to ban anti-lockdown protests ENTIRELY!
People are simply tired of being locked down. In European countries, the lockdowns have decimated life. Many people in these nations rely on tourism, which has been squashed.
There were a reported 2,250 officers in attendance. We know from past interactions that the German police have orders to “crackdown” on these people. A report from last year detailed this practice.
These videos are from the January 8th. You can see how this kind of brutality has escalated.
Despite orders to stay home yesterday, tens of thousands of Germans gathered in Berlin to protest the anti-human lockdowns that have decimated their communities.
The reaction from the police was maniacal. They began beating children in the street. In this particular case, this 10 year old boy is smashed in the face while his mother is dragged away.
Berlin, this cop is hitting a little boy in the head for worrying about his mom. ???#b0108#Polizeigewalt #Berlin ##polizeiberlin pic.twitter.com/TagbOs0Hlh
— Jo ?????? (@Blumenbel28) August 1, 2021
Officers also began beating a woman, punching her repeatedly, while she lay on the ground.
Police following orders #sanitariandictatorship #GreatReset #notoVaccinePassports #nazisraus #Querdenker #Querdenken #Berlin #b0108 #Polizeigewalt #violencespolicieres #globalsecuritylaw #MacronDemission #dictaturesanitaire #verandégage pic.twitter.com/WeoUwkOLNl
— watTyller ? #notoVaccinePassports ? (@GMalchemille) August 2, 2021
What exactly is going on in Germany? Why are things getting so chaotic?
The Chief Of Staff for the German Chancellor has announced that there will be ‘coming restrictions’ for unvaccinated Germans. This is forced desperation.
These people are worried that they may not be able to work, or purchase food. Being forced to choose between their medical freedom, or survival.
It is a choice that many around the world are being forced to make. It is a DIRECT violation of the Nuremberg code. Those who violate this code should be punished for their HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES.
Angela Merkel is holding the German people HOSTAGE. She is refusing to lift COVID restrictions until a higher number of Germans are vaccinated.
Our politicians are not ‘gods’. They do not RULE us. We elect them to represent US. NOTHING MORE.
I encourage the people of Germany to continue to fight for your freedoms. You have no idea the power that your resilience echoes throughout the world.
The American Patriots are behind your efforts 100%. No human being will be forced to take this vaccine. The people of the WORLD will ensure that this is the case.
We will not let medical tyrants destroy our world. Germany is making that clear, even in the face of brutal assault.
–
CHECK OUT THE LATEST EPISODE OF THE TROY SMITH SHOW FEATURING AN INTERVIEW WITH FOUNDER OF UNMASK THE KIDS, EJ TRON!
SHARE AND SPREAD THE WORD, BIG TECH IS CENSORING US LIKE NEVER BEFORE!
THE TRUTH IS AT LAUNCH LIBERTY!
It is a choice that many around the world are being forced to make. It is a DIRECT violation of the Nuremberg code. Those who violate this code should be punished for their HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES. ………………. THE NUREMBERG CODE
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be
so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element
of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and
should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter
involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter
element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental
subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment;
the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably
to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his
participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each
individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and
responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society,
unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation
and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the
anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental
suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that
death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the
experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian
importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the
experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest
degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who
conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the
experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the
experiment seemed to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate
the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith,
superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is
likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
[“Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law
No. 10”, Vol. 2, pp. 181-182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949.]