Senator Ron Johnson from Wisconsin revealed the highly politicized redactions in the Fauci emails. Johnson also pointed out that Fauci was not allowed to redact info from these emails.
Fauci redacted the following statement from his emails..
It’s been a very hard few months as these conspiracy theorists have gradually become Politicized and hardened in their stance. especially because the work we’ve been doing in collaboration with chinese virologists has given us incredible insight into the risk that these viruses represent so we can directly protect our nation from bat origin coronaviruses. we’re fighting to keep the communications open with our chinese colleagues so that we can better address future pandemics
Why was this redacted from Fauci’s emails? Allegedly, it was due to a current criminal investigation. In reality, it was most likely redacted to hide the true nature of Dr. Fauci.
He continues to conspire with the Chinese. He continues to reveal that he has funded, and has had full knowledge of the activities going on inside of the Wuhan Institue of Virology.
This is something that Fauci lied about to Congress. Under Oath.
Senator Rand Paul has already submitted a criminal referral to the DOJ showing evidence that Dr. Fauci lied under oath to Congress. This is further evidence.
Fauci is a CRIMINAL!
–
CHECK OUT THE LATEST EPISODE OF THE TROY SMITH SHOW FEATURING AN INTERVIEW WITH LEADER OF TAKE CALIFORNIA BACK, DR. CHRISTIAN VIGIL!
SHARE AND SPREAD THE WORD, BIG TECH IS CENSORING US LIKE NEVER BEFORE!
Farr’s Law dictates that the rise and fall of an epidemic as graphed by cases or deaths across time will approximate a bell-shaped curve.,,,, This approximate bell-shaped curve is the “Curve” referred to in the slogan “Flatten the Curve.” As with all scientific laws (gravity, motion, thermodynamics, etc.), Farr’s Law is involatile: due to epidemics’ inherent mathematical spread, an approximate bell-shaped curve will appear regardless of any efforts to mitigate a virus.
Mitigations applied to a population may reduce the slope of the curve (i.e., “flatten” it), or shorten the length of the curve, but as per Farr’s Law an approximate bell-shaped curve of deaths or cases will appear regardless.
WILLIAM FARR
Farr’s Law allows either cases or deaths to be plotted against time due to the inherent proportionality of deaths to cases for any disease condition. That is, a certain proportion of disease cases may be expected to result in deaths. This inherent proportionality is a cornerstone of our modern health sciences and its research efforts, and allows physicians to recommend risk-based treatment options to their patients.
This graphic shows how Farr’s bell-shaped curve occurred across four radically different nations: the US, Denmark, Italy, and China. These nations are vastly different in their population sizes, cultures, governing philosophies, land area, health systems, and when they instituted common mitigations. However, as a law of nature, Farr’s Law held primacy and still produced its bell-shaped curve despite these nations’ differences.
The Surge Event Leads Up to the Point of Herd Immunity
As a “bell curve,” Farr’s law dictates an epidemic will have a single peak. This peak and the period of time leading to it are also referred to as the Surge Event. The Surge Event and its impact on hospitals and the US health system are described in detail within the federal government’s June 2012 after-action report for the H1N1 pandemic of 2009 to 2010, An HHS Retrospective on the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic to Advance All Hazards Preparedness. As the prior novel pandemic, the federal government sought to capitalize on its H1N1 response for future pandemics by documenting within the report certain principles of pandemic spread and pandemic response.
The federal H1N1 pandemic report shows the primary obstacle of responding to a novel pandemic virus to be the Surge Event. The Surge Event is the time leading up to and including the peak of the epidemic when the greatest number of infected people are seeking hospital-level care at one time.
As a result of increased cases, the Surge Event overwhelms hospitals and forces health workers to begin splitting their time between more patients. As the face-to-face time between patients and providers begins to reduce, the proportion of confirmed deaths to confirmed cases begins to increase.
As more cases occur and more people seek hospital-level care, the Surge Event for a novel pandemic virus will be reflected in the hospital occupancy rate. Hospital occupancy rates will rise in proportion to the cases in the community.
The H1N1 pandemic report also discusses how the Surge Event will create a very limited period of time in which effective mitigations may be developed and put into place. Mitigations that arrive past the peak of the Surge Event will fail to materially reduce deaths and injuries. For influenza, this period of time is about six months between initial detection of the novel pandemic virus and the Surge Event. For SARS-2, which spreads roughly 40% faster, this time for preparation is even less.
As per the federal H1N1 after-action report, and given the initial detection of cases in the US to be around mid-December 2019, the window of time for the development and distribution of effective mitigations would have closed in May 2020. Therefore, even if effective, mitigations delivered past the time of May 2020 will have failed to materially prevent any deaths and injuries associated with the virus.
–
THIS IS PART TWO OF THE MATT MCBRIDE SERIES DETAILING THE FALSEHOODS AND DELUSIONS OF MAINSTREAM MEDIA SCIENCE.
PLEASE SHARE THIS ARTICLE WITH AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE. ALSO CHECK OUT PART ONE!
–
CHECK OUT THIS INTERVIEW WITH MATT FROM THE TROY SMITH SHOW WHERE HE DETAILS THIS REPORT.
SHARE AND SPREAD THE WORD, BIG TECH IS CENSORING US LIKE NEVER BEFORE!
In the days following the Capital Hill riot on Jan 6th it seem that at least four law enforcement officers who were on duty that day have been reported as committing suicide. One of these officers was a member of the US Capital Police and three were DC Metro Officers assigned to the Hill that day.
Let me be absolutely clear — the taking of one’s own life is a serious matter and is not condoned or mocked in any way by what I am about to say.
As reported in the Daily Mail:
“U.S. Capitol Police officer Howard Liebengood killed himself three days after the riot and DC Police Officer Jeffrey Smith shot himself on January 15, and DC Metropolitan Officer Gunther Hashida, 43, killed himself on July 29.”
Fox 5 in Virginia reports that:
“Kyle DeFreytag a DC Police Officer died on July 10; his mother confirms. She also says he responded to the Jan. 6 insurrection during the later shift and was outside the Capitol.”
The loss of these four officers is tragic for their families, their associates and their friends… of that there can be little doubt — but the issue here is trying to tie their actions to the events of January 6th.
It is hard to imagine that the events that took place that morning are the leading cause for four highly trained officers to suddenly lose all hope in living after being confronted with the actions that day. After all — the only person to be shot that day was an unarmed veteran who was shot by a yet to be officially identified Capital Hill plain cloths officer — executed by her own government without due process.
We have all seen the video — unarmed, climbing through a window, with no apparent warning from the shooter — Stop or I will shoot! — but none of the four officers who took their own life shot an unarmed civilian that day. In fact we don’t have any information beyond what Nancy Pelosi and her Kangaroo Commission want us to believe along with the media narrative, provided by Pelosi that somehow this is all connected.
The truly sad story here is the Socialist Democrats politicizing these deaths in an effort to reinforce their theme of domestic terrorism and an insurrection to overthrow the government. I don’t think anyone knows what the real reasons are that these four officers chose to take their own life; but there are some things that we can examine that might help us understand suicide better.
The Mayo Clinic website offers the following as the causes for suicide:
“Suicidal thoughts have many causes. Most often, suicidal thoughts are the result of feeling like you can’t cope when you’re faced with what seems to be an overwhelming life situation. If you don’t have hope for the future, you may mistakenly think suicide is a solution. You may experience a sort of tunnel vision, where in the middle of a crisis you believe suicide is the only way out.”
They go on to tell us about the risk factors for identifying a potential suicide:
“Attempted suicide before Feel hopeless, worthless, agitated, socially isolated or lonely. Experience a stressful life event, such as the loss of a loved one, military service, a breakup, or financial or legal problems. Have a substance abuse problem — alcohol and drug abuse can worsen thoughts of suicide and make you feel reckless or impulsive enough to act on your thoughts. Have suicidal thoughts and have access to firearms in your home. Have an underlying psychiatric disorder, such as major depression, post-traumatic stress disorder or bipolar disorder. Have a family history of mental disorders, substance abuse, suicide, or violence, including physical or sexual abuse. Have a medical condition that can be linked to depression and suicidal thinking, such as chronic disease, chronic pain or terminal illness. Are lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender with an unsupportive family or in a hostile environment.”
Given what the medical profession thinks are the associated causes and risks of suicide … I believe that it can be a logical conclusion that these four officers could have been suicidal for some time before January 6th. Without prying into the personal details of each of their lives the public will most likely never know the true cause for their actions.
Unlike Officer Sicknick, the Capital Hill Officer who passed from a stroke days after the riot as reported by the medical examiner — The same Officer Sicknick who Congressmen Jamie Raskin, the supposed Constitution scholar, who stood in the Well of the Senate and told the entire country that Officer Sicknick was killed by rioters after being hit in the head with fire extinguisher.
It was lie and he knew it was a lie at the time he said it — and he looked right into to the camera and lied to the entire Nation. The same Jamie Raskin who now sits on Pelosi’s Kangaroo Commission. Raskin lied to us then and there is no logical reason to expect that he is not lying to us now.
The facts are clear. We do not know how or why these four officers decided that it was time to end their time on earth and our condolences are offered to their families. I do however have serios doubts that after extended periods serving as law enforcement officers that the worst they ever experienced was the events of January 6th. Suicide is cruel for the people who are left behind and we cannot lose sight of that.
However, we must also not let Pelosi and her faux commission politicize these deaths and use them to tug at the emotional heartstrings of the Nation. Let the families grieve in peace and stop making what is a bad situation worse by tying these officers to that day.
What the country truly needs is Nancy Pelosi, UNDER OATH explaining her role, decisions and orders regarding the security arrangements on January 6th and why the Capital was not prepared! Now that would be progress to understanding that day in its complete context.
The Daily Mail.Com provides the following data:
-More cops died from suicide than were killed in the line of duty in 2019, study finds
-Advocacy group Blue H.E.L.P. released data showing at least 228 police officers killed themselves in 2019, compared to 132 who died in line of duty
-It is the highest number of police suicides since start of data collection in 2016
-New York state lead with 27 self-inflicted deaths, followed by California with 23 and Texas with 19
-Overwhelming majority of officers who took their own lives in 2019 were men More than 80 per cent of the officers who fell victim to suicide were white
–
CHECK OUT THE LATEST EPISODE OF THE TROY SMITH SHOW FEATURING AN INTERVIEW WITH LEADER OF TAKE CALIFORNIA BACK, DR. CHRISTIAN VIGIL!
SHARE AND SPREAD THE WORD, BIG TECH IS CENSORING OUR SITE LIKE NEVE BEFORE! WE SURVIVE ON YOUR SHARES!
I would like to begin this discussion with a quote from one of our Founding Fathers — Alexander Hamilton who said…
“If it be asked, what is the most sacred duty and the greatest source of security in the Republic? The answer would be, an inviolable RESPECT FOR THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS”
This is where the case begins — RESPECT FOR THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS.
One only has to look at the situation at our southern border to understand that acting President of the United States, Joe Biden has created a situation that is in direct and flagrant violation of our immigration laws. On January 20th when he slinked into the Office of the Presidency things at the border were clearly under control.
Yes, there were still illegal border crossers as there have been since the time Mexico seeded Texas to America. But by all reports from the Customs and Border Patrol agents on the ground they could easily handle the traffic that was still coming through the still unfinished border wall — but it was under control.
So let’s take a more detailed look at what we are dealing with here — Federal Immigration Law. Federal laws are written by Congress and become effective when signed by the U.S. president or when a presidential veto is overridden.
The Immigration and Nationality Act, which is the main law governing immigration in the United States, came from Congress, and it is Congress that has the power to change it or to write any other laws affecting immigration.
The agencies of the executive branch of government are responsible for administering Congress’s immigration laws by passing rules and regulations and actively carrying them out. The regulations are usually more expansive, detailed versions and interpretations of Congress’s laws, created by the agencies that administer those laws.
They must be followed like law, but they can’t be inconsistent with Congress’s laws. And yet the executive orders that have been issued by the acting President of the United States are very inconsistent with Congresses law.
On January 20th of this year the oath of office was administered to Joe Biden. The oath is found in Article II of the Constitution. It contains 35 words and goes as follows:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
Now this is the part that does not appear to be really hard, but Biden and his cabinet members seem to have a great deal of difficulty with … and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. Perhaps it is his ability that is in question here but the executive orders that he has written regarding the opening of our southern border are wreaking havoc on the entire country and he does not seem to care.
His executive orders do not appear to be consistent with the Laws passed by Congress — the law of the land and right there I believe we have the grounds for an impeachment. This is not about a phone call that the Swamp disagreed with or made up pretext by the Speaker of the House to try to impeach a President … this is a hard … step on it fact … we can see the video with our own eyes … thousands of people from all over the world not just from Mexico and Central America streaming into the southern boarder and our Acting President is doing nothing about it.
This brings us to the final phase and one we all became familiar with in the last legitimately authorized administration — the term “High Crimes and Misdemeanors”. Without going through the entire history of this term, which is taken from Article II, Sec.4 of the Constitution what we need to know is explained in an article written for the Atlantic magazine by Frank O. Bowman III titled: The Common Misconception About ‘High Crimes and Misdemeanors’.
Bowman tells us that … Both action and inaction by the chief magistrate, if sufficiently dangerous to the republic, must be impeachable if impeachment is to serve its intended purpose. Even conduct motivated by a sincere and deeply held principle can be a constitutional “high Crime.”
Clearly the activities at our southern border represent both action and inaction by our acting Chief Magistrate when it comes to the national security of the Nation. His willingness to flaunt the laws passed by Congress and to act in a dangerous and wreak less manner despite any deeply held principles he might have on the matter … do, by his very actions constitute a “High Crime” and impeachment proceeding should be initiated.
Now, I may have been born at night, but it was not last night. The idea that Nancy Pelosi would draft Articles of Impeachment against the current acting President could only happen in the land of Unicorns. But consider the possibility … in just 16 months we will have an election for the House of Representatives and the Senate.
A Republican majority in the House could propose such Articles of Impeachment and a Republican majority in the Senate could hold a trial that convicts Biden forcing him from office. That is not rooted in Unicorns — that is how the process works! But it will up to the Republican party to stiffen their backbones, put aside their “white gloves and party manners” and take up this mantel. After all it was the Socialist Demarcates that decided Impeachment was now a political tool — a tool that must now be used by the Republican if they are to save the Republic!
So I leave you again with the words of Alexander Hamilton: “If it be asked, what is the most sacred duty and the greatest source of security in the Republic? The answer would be, an inviolable RESPECT FOR THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS”.
–
CHECK OUT THE LATEST EPISODE OF THE TROY SMITH SHOW FEATURING AN INTERVIEW WITH HEALTH EXPERT MATT MCBRIDE!
SHARE AND SPREAD THE WORD, BIG TECH IS CENSORING US LIKE NEVER BEFORE!
The Supreme Court clearly stated that the moratorium would only be allowed to continue until the end of its current term, July 31, 2021.
Fox News stated about the ruling…
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in a concurring opinion that he agrees that the CDC exceeded their power with the moratorium, and made clear that he was only allowing it to continue because it was about to end. Had Kavanaugh voted the other way, it would have been a 5-4 ruling to vacate the stay and Judge Friedrich’s ruling against the moratorium would have taken effect.
The new order covers ‘areas of high transmission’ of COVID. This covers a reported 90% of the country.
This comes after members of Congress urged the CDC to extend the order despite a ruling from Brett Kavanaugh that it would take actual legislation to have a legitimate ‘eviction’ moratorium.
The CDC claims that these powers come from ‘Section 361’ of the Public Health Service Act. Heritage.org reports…
The CDC claims that Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act and its implementing regulation grant it this sweeping authority. The agency’s interpretation here is fundamentally flawed and stretches its power far beyond what the text permits
To stop the spread of a disease, the Public Health Service Act grants the CDC the power of “inspection, fumigation, disinfection, sanitation, pest extermination, destruction of animals or articles found to be so infected or contaminated … and other measures, as in [the Surgeon General’s] judgment may be necessary” for “purposes of carrying out and enforcing … regulations” that “in his judgment are necessary to prevent the introduction, transmission, or spread of communicable diseases” into the United States or across state lines.
The law doesn’t mention a nationwide eviction ban, and the reference to “other measures” is no help. A basic canon of statutory construction—known as the “ejusdem generis” (Latin for “of the same kind”) rule—is that when a broad, vague term follows a list of specifics, that term must refer only to the same sort of things listed before it.
Along with the new announcement, the CDC announced stiff penalties for anybody who evicts somebody from their own property. Penalties include…
-Potential $100,000 fine and 1 year in jail if eviction doesn’t result in death
-Up to $250,000 fine and 1 year in jail if evicted person dies
The full order can be seen here…
This kind of BLATANT abuse cannot continue. Republican members of Congress should move NOW to strip the CDC of it’s tyrannical move.
Our government is becoming increasingly out of control. These tyrants are simply ignoring the rule of law to destroy the American people.
How long will We the People allow it to continue?
–
CHECK OUT THE LATEST EPISODE OF THE TROY SMITH SHOW FEATURING AN INTERVIEW WITH HEALTH EXPERT MATT MCBRIDE! HE EXPOSES THE PANDEMIC FRAUD!
SHARE AND SPREAD THE WORD, BIG TECH IS CENSORING US LIKE NEVER BEFORE!
Over 600 protestors were arrested in Germany after taking to the streets despite not being permitted by their government.
Although the German government had allowed over 80,000 people to march in a ‘gay pride’ parade just a week ago, German authorities denied the permit to the anti-lockdown group for the August 2nd protest.
People are simply tired of being locked down. In European countries, the lockdowns have decimated life. Many people in these nations rely on tourism, which has been squashed.
There were a reported 2,250 officers in attendance. We know from past interactions that the German police have orders to “crackdown” on these people. A report from last year detailed this practice.
These videos are from the January 8th. You can see how this kind of brutality has escalated.
Despite orders to stay home yesterday, tens of thousands of Germans gathered in Berlin to protest the anti-human lockdowns that have decimated their communities.
The reaction from the police was maniacal. They began beating children in the street. In this particular case, this 10 year old boy is smashed in the face while his mother is dragged away.
These people are worried that they may not be able to work, or purchase food. Being forced to choose between their medical freedom, or survival.
It is a choice that many around the world are being forced to make. It is a DIRECT violation of the Nuremberg code. Those who violate this code should be punished for their HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES.
Our politicians are not ‘gods’. They do not RULE us. We elect them to represent US. NOTHING MORE.
I encourage the people of Germany to continue to fight for your freedoms. You have no idea the power that your resilience echoes throughout the world.
The American Patriots are behind your efforts 100%. No human being will be forced to take this vaccine. The people of the WORLD will ensure that this is the case.
We will not let medical tyrants destroy our world. Germany is making that clear, even in the face of brutal assault.
–
CHECK OUT THE LATEST EPISODE OF THE TROY SMITH SHOW FEATURING AN INTERVIEW WITH FOUNDER OF UNMASK THE KIDS, EJ TRON!
SHARE AND SPREAD THE WORD, BIG TECH IS CENSORING US LIKE NEVER BEFORE!
Early on during the pandemic, the Center for Disease Control issued an illegal and absurd order that placed a ‘moratorium’ on evicting renters.
The CDC is not elected. They do not set policy for the country. Yet, they were allowed to. The result has been a complete DISASTER.
Landlords across the country were left absolutely hung out to dry, in some cases not receiving a DIME for utilities or rent, but still being FORCED to house tenants who didn’t pay.
The government quite literally decided that Americans do not have the right to control who lives in their own properties. They decried that owners do not even have the right to STOP PAYING the utilities.
Many landlords are average, everyday people. Most simply use the rent as a means to pay the mortgage on their properties.
Who was fighting for THEIR rights? Nobody. Disgustingly, landlords have been treated like ‘rich fools’ who can afford to let their tenants do ANYTHING.
What are these people expected to do? Eat the cost. The government does not care, at all, about the financial well-being of the homeowner. They instead protect the renter, even when that renter is not paying his/her bills.
What is the justification for this? Job openings have hit an ALL TIME HIGH recently, even surpassing pre-pandemic levels. There is NO SHORTAGE of work, yet government coddles renters like there are virtually no jobs available. Pathetic.
This is an EVICTION moratorium. It is quite literally designed for those who are NOT PAYING their bills.
Why do these people have the right to use resources of the homeowners for free? Why does the government feel that it can dictate this sort of thing?
This ‘moratorium’ is completely unconstitutional. It is a slap in the face to the working American.
If you are kind enough to rent a property that you own, the absolute LAST THING you should be worried about is whether the government is going to make it ILLEGAL for you to evict a tenant who doesn’t pay.
Why on EARTH would a tenant who is not paying his/her bills be entitled to use your property? It is completely INSANE.
A Federal Judge ruled against the ‘eviction moratorium’ in May. The Supreme Court recently allowed the bullshit to continue until 7-31, but also ruled that it would take an act of Congress to restore the moratorium on a Federal level.
This government seems intent on punishing anybody who has achieved success. Landlords represent smart, savvy property owners who benefit the community by offering housing.
Because of our government’s ‘eviction moratorium’, the American landlord is being FORCED out of the industry. Maybe that was the plan all along.
No American should be forced to pay for a tenant who is not paying their bills. Landlords should have the power to evict AS STATED IN THE LEASE AGREEMENT.
If you don’t pay your rent, you don’t get to live there. Get over it. We have to wonder exactly how many of these people that aren’t paying their rent are Democrat voters.
–
CHECK OUT THIS EPISODE OF THE TROY SMITH SHOW FEATURING AN INTERVIEW WITH HEALTHCARE EXPERT MATT MCBRIDE!
SHARE AND SPREAD THE WORD, BIG TECH IS CENSORING US LIKE NEVER BEFORE!
The Biden COVID response team has announced that they plan to start pushing vaccine requirements on the American people.
In an ever-predictable tyrannical power-grab, the Biden Administration is now seeking to force vaccines on Americans who choose not to get the jab.
What ever happened to medical choice? Why do these people feel comfortable proposing such awful, illegal, tyrannical policies?
What would these so-called ‘requirements’ look like? Are these people seriously going to try to destroy people’s lives over a vaccine for a virus with a survival rate north of 99%?
It seems that way. It is a terrible plan. It WILL NEVER work.
The people of this country will NOT be forcibly vaccinated. They WILL NOT be exiled from society for THEIR MEDICAL CHOICE.
People from all around the world have been rallying for medical freedom. Thousands have been gathered in France to protest vaccine mandates for WEEKS.
We the People will stand up to these RIDICULOUS mandates. We will not allow this rabid administration to decimate medical freedom.
These people should be removed from office for even espousing such radical, unconstitutional policies.
–
CHECK OUT THE LATEST EPISODE OF THE TROY SMITH SHOW FEATURING AN INTERVIEW WITH HEALTHCARE EXPERT MATT MCBRIDE!
SHARE AND SPREAD THE WORD, BIG TECH IS CENSORING US LIKE NEVER BEFORE!
Since the arrival of its first case into the United States, which has been estimated to be as early as mid-December 2019, public discourse on the SARS-2 virus has unfortunately devolved from the scientific to the soundbite. As is evident from the array of conflicting mitigations enacted by the States and localities, this dangerous virus has for the better part of a year failed to be discussed in a rational manner that is supported by the established public health science.
Known also by the disease condition it causes, COVID-19, this virus has sadly opened a political fault line which should never occur during the exigency of a public health emergency when the lives of so many are at risk. Culpability for this politicization falls across the public, the media, all levels of government, with members of each aligning their views on a virus to their political belief systems. Unfortunately, this politicization of COVID-19 has caused fear and seeded suspicion among neighbors, and promoted a distrust in our health institutions that may take many years to dispel.
This paper has been compiled so that the next public health emergency may be considered less on a political base and more on the solid foundation of the principles of public health science that have been established and tested for almost 200 years. To the discredit of the nation’s public health establishment, much of what is discussed in this paper has received little to none of the attention that otherwise, had it been pronounced to the public and political leaders, could have alleviated needless fear and calmed many people into returning to their normal lives.
The following established public health principles are presented and explained in this paper as they apply to the SARS-2 virus. Where relevant, these principles are demonstrated mathematically:
Farr’s Law is the prevailing scientific law of epidemic spread and mandates that the course of an epidemic as plotted by its cases or deaths against time must follow an approximate bell-shaped curve. The peak of Farr’s bell-shaped curve, commonly referred to as the Surge Event, is the point of herd immunity. Farr’s curve may be plotted with either cases or deaths due to the inherent proportionality of deaths to cases. As a law of nature, Farr’s Law is involatile, and apparent violations of Farr’s Law indicates problems within policies and procedures surrounding data collection and reporting, errors in data collection or analysis, or data fraud.
The base reproduction ratio, denoted as R0, is the number of people one infected person can infect in a perfectly infectable population. For COVID-19, this number is about 2.5: one person with COVID-19 can on average cause 2.5 other people to become infected. This number is a critical piece of information that allows for the calculation, prediction, and observation within the data, from several perspectives, of the herd immunity threshold. Additionally, nowhere within the herd immunity threshold formula is there a variable for a vaccine, showing that contrary to various public statements, herd immunity is not dependent on a vaccine.
The herd immunity threshold is precisely calculated using R0 through the formula 1-(1/R0). Herd immunity is also described as the point when R0 falls below 1.0 – one person infects fewer than one other person – and the pandemic mathematically eliminates itself out. For any virus, a predicted date of herd immunity can be established using the herd immunity threshold formula, case fatality rate, and estimates of population size, the virus’ infectious period, base reproduction ratio (R0), and date of first known infection. The predicted herd immunity threshold can also be aligned to observations on the graphs of the hospital occupancy rate and the case fatality rate. Together, these pieces allow the date of herd immunity to be established fairly accurately. Using this process, it is demonstrated within this paper that COVID-19 herd immunity predictions and observations all align to the second week of May 2020; and the “second COVID wave” mathematically fits the profile of an average influenza virus peaking at the third week of January 2021, the curve for which has been “flattened” most likely by the influenza vaccine.
Mathematically, there are no realistic scenarios wherein SARS-2 could be considered “highly contagious” while taking almost 19 months to reach herd immunity. Such a scenario would include requiring a US population size of 6.5E+30 people. Other scenarios result in SARS-2 being extremely non-infectious with a doubling period of 27.6 days, or having a herd immunity threshold of only 6%. Otherwise, the extreme latest date that the SARS-2 virus under all current conditions could reach herd immunity within the US population is October 27, 2020, past which point a pandemic becomes mathematically eliminated.
As the Surge Event increases cases, hospital occupancy rates must increase proportionally. However, at no time during the SARS-2 pandemic did the hospital occupancy rate exceed the 85% to 90% “financial sweet spot” for hospitals. Hospitals therefore admitted and released patients with positive COVID-19 tests not based on the Medicare standard of “medical necessity,” but rather in ways that allowed them to reap a maximum financial return.
The curve of the Case Fatality Rate (CFR) demonstrates that the mitigations of social distancing and mask use did not function to reduce the spread of COVID-19 and were thus ineffective. Additionally, the federal government’s after-action report for the H1N1 pandemic notes that masks are ineffective if they are not rated for viruses, if they are not fit-tested to the individual wearer, and if the wearer is not trained to use the mask.
Change in policies surrounding COVID-19 testing resulted in the propagation of the incorrect narrative that COVID-19 was devastating the population. This narrative is not supported by either the observed curves of the CFR or the hospital occupancy rate.
The federal H1N1 after-action report states there is a six-month window after the initial detection of a pandemic virus for the development and deployment of an effective vaccine to have any impact on the Surge Event. The introduction of a COVID-19 vaccine in December 2020, seven months after this window closed in approximately May 2020, means that these vaccines have failed to materially reduce any deaths or injuries associated to the virus.
–
THIS IS PART ONE OF A MULTI PART SERIES DETAILING THE FAILURES OF GOVERNMENT DURING THE COVID-19 RESPONSE! CHECK OUT MY INTERVIEW WITH THE AUTHOR, HEALTHCARE EXPERT MATT MCBRIDE!
v
SHARE AND SPREAD THE WORD, BIG TECH IS CENSORING US LIKE NEVER BEFORE!
/rent_house_73089751-5bfc333346e0fb002602ddbe.jpg)
